This repository contains raw data in support of the publication 10.1002/adma.202301562. Please refer to the published paper, available open access, for full information and context.

Figure 2 data

• Panel b: Confocal image of core-shell particle
• Panel d: Absorbance data to probe pH responsiveness of the DNA constructs
• Panel c: CD data to probe pH responsiveness of the DNA constructs
• Panel g: Representative epifluorescence and bright field images and bright field videos to demonstrate pH-induced particle aggregation

Figure 3 data

• Panel b: pH and OD data vs E. coli growth time in various glucose concentrations
• Panels d, e; Representative epifluorescence images and bright field videos to demonstrate E. coli induced particle aggregation and bacteria trapping
• Panel f: OD data vs E. coli growth time

Figure 4 data

• Panel b: OD data vs E. coli growth time showing effect of netosis-like synthetic pathway
• Panel e: Representative bright field and epifluorescence images showing effect of netosis-like synthetic pathway

Supplementary Figure 1: Agarose gel demonstrating DNA construct assembly

Supplementary Figure 2: DLS data showing pH responsiveness of DNA nanostructures

Supplementary Figure 3: UV melting curve data for DNA constructs

Supplementary Figure 4: DLS data underpinning pH response curve

Supplementary Figure 5: Representative data provided in Figure 2, Panel g folder

Supplementary Figure 6: Representative microscopy videos used to generate hydrodynamic radius data with DDM

Supplementary Figure 7: OD data vs E. coli growth time at various glucose concentrations

Supplementary Figure 8: FITC dextran fluorescence intensity data (used to determine pH) vs E. coli growth time at various glucose concentrations

Supplementary Figure 9: Calibration data (FITC dextran fluorescence vs pH) used in Figure 3f and Supplementary Figures 8 and 12

Supplementary Figure 10: FITC dextran fluorescence intensity data (used to determine pH in Figure 3f) vs E. coli growth time at various glucose concentrations

Supplementary Figure 11: Representative data provided in Figure 3, Panel d, e folder

Supplementary Figure 12: FITC dextran fluorescence intensity data (used to determine pH) vs E. coli growth time Supplementary Figure 13: Calibration data (Fluorescein dT fluorescence vs pH) for fluorescent pH probe linked to DNA particles

Supplementary Figure 14: Fluorescent data for pH-induced de-quenching on DNA particles

Supplementary Figure 15: OD vs E. coli growth time at various antibiotic concentrations

Supplementary Figure 16: Representative data provided in Figure 4, Panel c, folder