|Authors: ||Brunekreeft, Gert|
|Issue Date: ||16-Jun-2004|
|Abstract: ||Driven by fear of underinvestment in network assets, merchant investment in electricity transmission networks (MTI) is now legally allowed. Given that MTI is a real possibility, regulators face a new set of questions. After classifying different types of MTI, the paper raises and analyses regulatory questions, concentrating on the effect on competition, ownership questions, third-party-access regimes and must-offer provisions. Basically, the paper concludes that the light-handed approach of unregulated MTI supports a light-handed approach with respect to complementary measures as well. In many cases, it is justified to refrain from sector-specific arrangements because competition law, if necessary at all, will suffice. However, details matter.|
|Appears in Collections:||Cambridge Working Papers in Economics|
This item has been accessed 648 times.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.