Title: The Process of Negotiating Settlements at FERC
Authors: Littlechild, Stephen
Keywords: Regulation
negotiated settlement
Issue Date: 31-Jan-2011
Publisher: Faculty of Economics
Series/Report no.: CWPE
1116
Abstract: Interstate gas pipelines and their customers presently settle about 90% of the rate cases set for hearing before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). In recent years, the median time for negotiating settlements and having them approved is about 11 months, compared to several years to complete litigated hearings. This paper explores how this is achieved. FERC has a tight schedule for the hearing process. In contrast to other jurisdictions, FERC Trial Staff play an active role in facilitating negotiation and settlement. They propose a first settlement offer 3 months after a pipeline files for a tariff rate increase. An analysis of the 9 cases over the last two years where full and uncontested settlement was reached shows that discussions led by Trial Staff led to agreement in principle in a median time of 2 ½ months after this first offer, just before testimony would otherwise need to have been filed. It took a further 2 ½ months for the parties to finalise the wording of the settlement and to obtain the judge’s certification that it was uncontested, and 3 months for FERC formally to approve it. FERC’s settlement process has worked successfully and essentially unchanged for over 35 years. It suggests a more active role for the regulatory body than was previously apparent.
URI: http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/241875
Appears in Collections:Cambridge Working Papers in Economics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
cwpe1116.pdf286.15 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Additional resources for this item
search for alternative versions in eresources@cambridge
retrieve citation metadata in EndNote format

This item has been accessed 169 times.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.