Caroline Humphrey interviewed by Alan Macfarlane 5th August 2010

 

0:05:07 Born in London in 1943; my paternal (Waddington) grandfather was a tea  planter in India in the Nilgiri Hills so my father, who was a scientist, was  born in India and remembered it with great affection; I never met my  grandfather as he died in India but I saw letters that he sent to my father  when he was at school; I do not know much about that side of my family but I  was influenced indirectly by the thought of India as a wonderful land; on my  mother's side, my great-grandfather was quite a high official in New Zealand -  Pember Reeves; he was a reformer who brought in things like votes for women  before they happened in Britain; my grandmother was a Fabian and quite an  intellectual - Amber Pember Reeves; she read moral sciences at Newnham and she  was a big influence on my life: she had an affair with H.G. Wells when she was  a student which was a big scandal at the time; she became pregnant so my aunt  is her daughter by H.G. Wells; as he was not going to marry her, to her rescue  came a nice young lawyer, my grandfather, who made her respectable; his name  was Blanco-White, and in the family there was a legend that Blanco was a  Spanish Jewish family who fled from Spain and ended up in Britain, and took the  name White to explain the Blanco; I later discovered that this probably is not  true, that White was an Irish sea captain who went to Spain and took the Blanco  to explain the White; this family was very Catholic and some time in the late  nineteenth century a rather famous Blanco-White took exception to this  religiosity and ran away from Spain and settled in England; he was an  anti-religious figure and a poet and pamphleteer; he was, I think, my  grandfather's ancestor; I knew both these grandparents well; my grandmother was  a very intellectual figure and quite scary; she used to say that the only  respectable academic discipline was mathematics, and things like music were  positively disgraceful; she used to teach in Morley College in London, an adult  education college; she taught philosophy so was very logical; my grandfather  was a much more cheery, rosy figure; he was a family lawyer and used to enjoy  talking about cases   

 

5:34:04 My mother was one of Amber's three children; she was very artistic and  became an architect; she also had some of her mother's rigour and was an  architect in the Bauhaus, modern, stylish mode in Britain; she did build a  couple of houses in Cambridge; however, after the War, very little was being  built of that kind; she became an architect for Edinburgh City Council; she  worked all through her life so I had this example of a working woman as my  mother; she was a loving mother but she admired elegance and style, and it was  the same with thoughts and ideas; my father, C.H. Waddington, came up to  Cambridge and I think he read geology; he was very friendly with people like  Bernal and other well known Cambridge people of the 1930s, Needham was another  friend of his; he moved into genetics after graduating as a geologist; I think  he had a research fellowship at Sidney Sussex; both he and my mother were  rather on the left; my mother was actually a member of the Communist Party, my  father was not, but they were both in that group of intellectuals; I must have  met Bernal as a child, I met Gregory Bateson who was a great friend of my  father's, also Margaret Mead who was influential on me; she was terrific and I  met her in my teens; I think my father always thought anthropology an  interesting subject; at that time it was difficult to travel but he did so when  he could, to Africa and so on; part of this was Margaret Mead arriving with  stories of islands in the Pacific; I remember her saying to me once that if I  wanted to be an anthropologist, not to worry about it too much as six weeks was  enough to learn any language - not really very good advice; she was full of  energy and I would have thought quite attractive, especially in her youth; my  father was quite a shy man but he had a great sense of fun; he loved new things  and was always travelling; he went to America, he listened to jazz, and liked  things like John Cage's experimental music which consisted of almost nothing; I  remember him telling me about one of John Cage's art ideas which was to do with  water and the different taste of different waters; this art object consisted of  tasting about fifteen different waters; he was intrigued by things like that;  he wrote a book about abstract painting in the fifties and sixties, and the  influence of scientific visions on that; what was suddenly available as an  insight into the structure of something through science, and how that opened  the eyes of painters during that period; my own connection with the Fitzwilliam  Museum and my own interest in art stems from my parents    11:50:15 I grew up in Edinburgh; I remember the house we moved into after the  War when I must have been about four; it was in effect a kind of commune; it  was a large eighteenth century mansion outside Edinburgh which my father's  institute rented for the entire institute; it was a new institute and was just  being set up, and as people did not have enough money to buy houses everybody  was in it from the lab technicians to the professor; it was wonderful for us  children because there was a separate dining room for us and we had lots of  other children to play with; it was a huge estate with a great garden around it  with statues and fountains, so we had an absolutely wonderful time there; I  have a younger sister and a half-brother from my father's first marriage; this  place, Morton Hall, may be one of the things that lies behind me being an  anthropologist; it was more fun for the children than for the adults; I think  the notion of people living in a commune was very difficult after the War; the  women especially felt that they couldn't express themselves as women because  there was no kitchen, just communal eating; they couldn't be wives in the way  they thought they ought or wanted to be; I didn't know about it at the time but  I gather there were all sorts of rumours of affairs and so on; it fell apart  after about four or five years, and we moved into Edinburgh; my first school  was a P.N.E.U. school which was thought to be progressive; it was a pleasant  place; I remember a lot of emphasis was placed on art and painting; it wasn't  very hot on learning to read and write so I didn't really learn to do so until  I went to my next school; that was a standard Edinburgh high school and I went  there between seven and eight; I remember coming into the bottom class not  knowing how to read and write; one thing we did in our family was quite a lot  of painting and sketching, so I guess I was taught from an early age to look at  landscapes, trees or places, and to think how you might capture them; the other  thing I did was music; when we moved into Edinburgh we were living in the same  street as a refugee composer from Vienna called Hans Gal; his daughter became a  very close friend of me and my sister, and almost immediately we all had  lessons in playing instruments and started playing in little trios and  quartets; that was a very strong element all through my childhood; I played the  piano, and still do; I was annoyed because my sister played the piano and the  cello and because of that she could play in many more things, and play in an  orchestra; I wanted to learn the violin but my mother forbade me because I was  not actually very good at school and was always tailing along the bottom of the  class; I think she thought I couldn't handle two instruments and school work   

 

17:46:21 Classical music has been very important throughout my life; it is not  that I don't like other music but I play classical music; I came to have a very  good teacher from the age of about twelve, but when I went to university I  practically gave it up; there wasn't a teacher here and I was doing other  things, and when I was away in Russia doing fieldwork, it became impossible;  although I had a piano at home I didn't do very much, but when I was in my  forties I got a two year readership and had a bit more time, so I took piano  lessons again;  more recently, in the last five years, I have again been taking  lessons; it is the most wonderful thing because it is completely apart from  academic work as you use a different part of your brain; it is a question of  honing your listening and making that coordinate with your physical movements -  tiny things, and very fast, so you have to be completely in control, aware and  alert; since it is so engaging of the mind it is a real break from the  obsessions of writing; I play Bach, Beethoven, Schubert, all the greats; I  suppose it indirectly feeds into my writing in so far as music has a structure,  and a phrase of music has a shape; perhaps one would try to emulate that in  one's writing so that it is not too lumpy and awkward; more directly, I  suppose, because I loved music it was one of the main reasons why I went to  Russia as an anthropologist; when I was still at school I had a great passion  for the Russian cellist Rostropovich, at the time when people like him had just  come to the West, and the Russian pianist, Richter who became an abiding hero  because he is such a great pianist; one of the reasons I was so happy to choose  Russia was because all these wonderful musicians were there   

 

22:00:04 The high school was a girls' school and quite strict; I remember  loving English, history, art; I don't think it was a distinguished school and a  lot more of my education came from being in the kind of family I was in,  meeting people my parents knew, the fact that there were books everywhere in  the house and the fact that one could be reading something they had never  thought of at school; I was a keen reader; I remember reading Proust at the age  of sixteen - perhaps not the whole lot, but several books; my parents had sent  me away to France when I was quite young; at fourteen I went on an exchange,  and then did so three summers running with a group of French families; that  made me love French culture and the language, so was a good thing to have done;  I don't think I am a good linguist as I treat languages as working tools and  have never done a really formal course in Russian, for example; Mongolian was  not really something one could do anything very formal with, so I don't think I  speak them very correctly, but I am reasonably fluent in French and Russian,  and more or less in Mongolian; I stayed at that school until I was eighteen; I  must have got the average number of Scottish Highers and was desperate to go to  university, but not to Edinburgh because I wanted to avoid my parents; I said  that I wanted to go to Cambridge but the headmistress said I was not up to that  standard and would make the school look bad if I failed; that really annoyed me  and I started to work for the first time in my life; my mother helped by  getting me extra tuition, so I got some 'A' levels - history, English, and  history of art -  and got into Cambridge; I remember my English teacher, my art  teacher and my history teacher, Miss Pearson, who was an enormous influence; I  was most influenced by my piano teacher, Miss Edna Lovell; it was a hearty  school and I tried my best, but I was no good at it; I was in the third hockey  team for my house; theatre, debating, and that kind of thing I did at  Cambridge, not at school; when I came here I entered Girton College; I mostly  gave up on music, though I did keep up the flute; I did a lot in the theatre in  my first two years, doing scenery design and stage management.   

 

27:43:08 My parents were atheists so I had no religious education except what  happened at school; for me, churches were mysterious places with possible  glamorous goings-on, because I never went into them; I suppose I was aware that  other people would go to Sunday school, but I do remember in my teens thinking  I ought to sneak out and actually go to churches to see what went on in them; I  did try to look inside some churches in Edinburgh, but it was a pretty frosty  city and the churches were not places you could drop into; I suppose I was  rather ignorant of all that and remain so to some extent; when, here in  Cambridge, people go to chapel, and I have to do so now for various reasons,  everybody lustily sings hymns that they all know, but I don't know them; I  think perhaps this thwarted early interest was why I became interested in  shamanism and other religious faiths; I also did become interested in  Christianity, and for a period was quite religious; I did get Confirmed in the  Church of England in middle-age, so it is a dimension of life that I have some  feeling for, though I am not very active now; I suppose I would think of myself  as agnostic; I think the culture of religion, or what religious people have  done in our history, is so enormous that it is part of the background of being  a European; you cannot ignore it, and to understand it you have to have some  feeling for what it means to be religious; I think science can disprove many of  the claims of people who are religious - the absurdity of particular dates of  creation, or miracles - but I don't think science could do anything about what  people feel about essential mysteries which we don't understand and may never  understand, yet we have intimations that there are things that maybe our brains  are not capable of appreciating; at any rate there does seem to be some order  behind things that we don't have an explanation for; all of that kind of thing  is part of being human, and I don't think that science is going to disprove it  or prove it; some of the things shaman do are very extraordinary in terms of  creating transformations in other people, which you might call curing or  reviving; I don't have any explanation for it; the people who believe in it see  it as religious in some sense, and it is very remarkable; I do think there are  some very gifted people, gifted in some ways that our culture left in abeyance;  I have always thought the idea that you have individualism in the West, and  that elsewhere people conform to cultures, just ridiculous; the most in a sense  individualistic people in my experience are shamans; they have the most  extraordinary personalities, absolutely riveting and strange, and they can do  things with their ways of talking, looking and addressing people; I have had  experience with one particular shaman whose ability was to sense other  personalities within people that were not obvious; the way she put this was not  in terms of personality, but about a spirit you might have that you don't know  about, or a previous life; she said she was capable of drawing this out of you;  she did this for me and several friends - who knows what there was about it? -  but it didn't appear haphazard or meaningless; she described it as former  existences  

 

 36:42:21 Just before I left my school in Edinburgh a new headmistress arrived  who had been a don at Girton; she suggested that I apply to Girton and that is  why I came to Cambridge; I wanted to read English as I wanted to be a writer,  but English at Girton was full that year so they gave me a place to read  anthropology; it was accidental, but I have never regretted it; I remember  Meyer Fortes who was seemingly strict and quite dry; I came to appreciate him  later but at the time his lectures seemed old-fashioned; far more exciting at  that time were Edmund Leach and Stanley Tambiah, who was also there; Maurice  Bloch was a graduate student at the time and also supervised me; all of them  were doing a different kind of anthropology than Fortes, and I was much more  excited by it; I was perhaps dimly aware that there were tensions between Leach  and Fortes, but one was much more aware that they just took a different line on  anthropology, and might almost have had different definitions of what it was;  Jack Goody was there but I didn't have much to do with him; he was associated  with Fortes and African studies and I was more interested in Asia; Maurice was  not especially interesting as an undergraduate supervisor; I knew him better  and discovered his research work when I was a graduate student; there was a  woman at Girton who was a very good teacher, Doris Wheatley, and Audrey  Richards was a wonderful supervisor; those people had a passion for  anthropology and made it seem exciting as a subject; I never regretted doing it  instead of English; my student contempories included Jonathan Parry, Enid  Schildkrout, Keith Hart, Stephen Hugh-Jones, Marilyn Strathern was a few years  older, and Susan Drucker Brown; the myth that everyone mingled and went  together to the bun shop was not true of me; I felt being stuck out at Girton  that there was probably a little inner group based in King's because both  Fortes and Leach were fellows there, and that perhaps students there did that  kind of thing; most of my time in Cambridge I was in the ADC theatre and not  very devotedly doing anthropology, although I was interested in it;  Levi-Strauss was the thing in those days; I remember reading 'La Pensée  Sauvage' and various other books by him and found them really exciting; that  was the kind of research Edmund was doing and Mary Douglas was writing her  great works at that time; Tambiah was also involved; it was opening up a whole  new world, and one was aware that anthropology was also interesting to those  outside the subject; any educated person would be reading Levi-Strauss at that  time and people would be interested in anthropology, which has completely  disappeared now; perhaps people now think there is nothing left to discover,  but I think it was more that Levi-Strauss and the structuralists in general had  a theory of looking at culture which was much wider, more philosophical than  than purely anthropological; it was taken as an approach in literary studies  and all sorts of different areas of academia; it was also a universal idea,  something that told you about humankind that people had not thought of before;  I suppose a lot of theories in anthropology now have become so relativistic and  tied to specifics, that it has become much less interesting for people in  general.   

 

45:28:17 I got a 2:1 but it was good enough at that time to do research; I had  decided I wanted to work in Russia, so as soon as I graduated I enrolled in a  course in Russian language which was done on the Sidgwick site by some ex-army  tutors; it was a very efficient course where they just barked it into you; you  were not allowed to speak a word of English for six weeks and by the end it was  possible to get along in Russian; for some reason Meyer was appointed as my  supervisor but he was very against my working in Russia; he said it was too  closed and propagandized and that nobody would talk to me, and that the last  anthropologist who had tried to go there, James Woodburn, was thrown out; I was  put down to study peasants in Poland, but I still wanted to go to Russia; it so  happened that during that academic year Meyer was off on sabbatical in America,  and while he was away I started working on some people called Yakut, now called  Sakha, living in the north of Siberia, and preparing myself to go and do  fieldwork there; I spent a year reading every single thing I could on them and  in registering for the British Council exchange scheme with Russia; I managed  to get a studentship from them, and by the time Fortes came back it was more or  less a fait accompli that I was going to Russia; during his absence I had not  been supervised by anyone else; in those days it was much more free and easy;  there was no pre-fieldwork training and no advice was given on what to do; we  were even told that we should avoid going to the field with too much theory  ('preconceptions'), so as to keep ourselves open to every kind of experience;  we did have a sort of training from the Foreign Office before going to Russia  because this was at the height of the Cold War, and it was reckoned we would  come under scrutiny from the KGB; about twelve of us went to this place in the  Foreign Office and they told us of the various ways we could be entrapped by  the KGB; I remember we all came out laughing thinking it was rubbish; but in  fact it all happened more or less as they predicted; it was lucky for me that  the Russian KGB was rather sexist; there were not many women in our British  group but a lot of the men had problems; we women were left much more alone;  the men would be made drunk, or drugged on one occasion, and would wake up in  bed with some woman and a photographer would burst in, that kind of thing.  At that time in the 1960s my mother was no longer a member of the Party; she  had left in 1956 at the time of the Hungarian uprising. But that background did  mean I knew what these professors in Moscow University were talking about;  there must have been in my youth some kind of notion of respect for the working  class or more disadvantaged people, and equality, all those things that are  supposed to matter, and do, in a socialist society; I suppose Soviet Russia was  much less strange to me than it would have been to a lot of people from  Britain; I don't remember my parents ever discussing Lenin or Marx, it was  more, I suppose, a general attitude and an absence of what you might get in a  lot of middle-class English households - a sort of horror concerning Russia; I  did also have a Latvian nanny at one point in my childhood who was a refugee,  and she told me lots of folk stories of forests and fairytale lands. From her  and my mother I also heard about cruelties and invading armies.   

 

53:00:21 I first went to Russia before I intended to do anthropology, on  camping holiday there as a student; we had a car and we drove from Finland; I  remember disembarking at Leningrad and it did seem unlike any country in the  West, even Finland; Leningrad and Vyborg immediately give an impression of  incredible greyness and drabness; everybody dressed differently, the houses  were dusty, concrete edifices; parts had been bombed during the War and not  rebuilt; the food was rough and sour, so it did have a feeling of being another  world; you had to adjust all your sense of colour and what people's  personalities might be like, the tone of life was utterly different; Russia  isn't like that now but it was then; when I went to do fieldwork, I was in  Moscow University, sharing accommodation with a Russian girl who I later  realized had to report on what I was doing; I do remember the feeling that  somehow everything was different, the smell, taste of food, clothes people  wore, the books people were reading in the University, the way the professors  behaved, was just another world; I was initially planning to go to North  Siberia to work on the Yakuts and I was very interested in the notion of these  people who had arrived from the south, they were horse-breeding, Turkish  language speakers, had come from way down in Central Asia and found their way  up to this place, beyond the Arctic Circle; they were living as semi-nomads  with herds of horses and cattle in an inconceivably harsh environment; I was  very interested in how you could make a life in such a culture in a place that  was so utterly difficult and dangerous; but when I got to Moscow my Professor  said that I couldn't go there; I don't know what the real reasons were but he  said that it was not possible to travel there in spring and autumn because the  land became a big swamp, and in the winter it was inconceivably cold - the  coldest place in the world, which was true - and in the summer it was full of  mosquitoes; so then I had to find somewhere else for my research; we had a  bargaining session; my plan for work had to be inserted in the plan for their  department as everything in Russia was done according to a plan; it was decided  that I would go to the Buryats as they were quite similar to the Yakuts, but  living in the south of Siberia as oppose to the north; I then had many months  in Moscow waiting to get permission to go and do fieldwork, about nine months;  the whole period was important to my research as I spent nine or ten months  reading about the Buryats, everything I could find; the result was that I now  have a really good historical knowledge of them, I spent every day in the Lenin  Library reading about them from dawn to dusk; it was incredibly useful, and I  think living in Moscow was part of the research as I learnt a lot about Soviet  life more generally; I stayed two months in the field in Buryatia; it was not  like the fieldwork that people do now as it was planned and had to be  negotiated every step of the way; it wasn't just that I had to get permission  from Moscow University to leave Moscow but had to get an invitation at the  other end for them to receive me; I only did this by sheer luck really as  somebody from Buryatia came to Moscow and dropped in on my Professor who had  become a good friend of mine; I managed to impress this woman as to what a  nice, innocent person I was; she very kindly issued the invitation, otherwise I  never would have been able to go; people really didn't do such things; no  foreigner really went anywhere outside their designated city for research, and  no British student had done anything like this before; the field site was far  away beyond Lake Baikal; when I got there I found they had a schedule for me,  that I should go to this collective farm for one month and another for the  second month, so I didn't have any choice about where I went; but it was fine -  the whole area was interesting to me and I had many questions I longed to find  an answer to; the Buryats had been well studied by Russians; one reason is that  they lie on the direct route between Moscow and China and Mongolia; all the  great Russian explorers, who were mostly army officers, would have to go to  Buryatia, and they used the Buryats as assistants on these expeditions, so it  was very well studied by Russians