http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk:80/handle/1810/221695 Thu, 23 May 2013 13:37:40 GMT 2013-05-23T13:37:40Z http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk:80/handle/1810/244266 Title: Chinese parenting and children's compliance to adults: a cross-cultural comparative study Authors: Huang, Ching-Yu Soar Abstract: The current study examined the parenting beliefs and practices of Taiwanese, Chinese immigrant (all first-generation immigrants in the UK) and English mothers, and the compliance of their young children (aged 5–7), in order to elucidate the effects of child temperament, culture and acculturation strategies on reported parenting beliefs and practices, observed parental behaviour, child behaviour, mother–child interaction dynamics and children’s compliance. The data were collected from a total of 90 families with 5- to 7-year-old children in Taiwan and the UK. Child temperament, parenting beliefs and practices and acculturation were assessed using questionnaires, and parental behaviour, child behaviour, dyadic interaction dynamics and child compliance were assessed using observation in two tasks (Etch-A-Sketch and clean-up). Semi-structured interviews were also conducted with the Chinese immigrant parents to gather more information regarding their acculturation and parenting. Cultural differences were found between groups in reported as well as observed parenting and children’s compliance. The Taiwanese mothers reported greater use of Chinese-specific parenting and physical coercion and were observed to use more (gentle and assertive) physical intervention than both the Chinese immigrant and English mothers. The Chinese immigrant mothers reported a higher degree of child autonomy than the Taiwanese and English mothers, and also reported cultivation of their children’s independence. The stronger the Chinese immigrant mothers' affiliation with Chinese culture, the more they reported adopting the Chinese-specific parenting style; the longer they had been in the UK, the less they reported authoritarian parenting. The English mothers were rated as more responsive and less negatively controlling than the Chinese immigrant mothers; they also showed more positive affect than both the Chinese immigrant and Taiwanese mothers. There were few cultural differences between groups in the children’s behaviour, although Taiwanese children showed more situational compliance than Chinese immigrant children. Further regression analyses showed that child characteristics, such as child age and temperament, affected the parents’ and children’s behaviour as well as dyadic interactional dynamics. Committed compliance, situational compliance and opposition were associated with different predictors, suggesting that they are qualitatively different and are associated with different developmental processes. Committed compliance may develop as children grow older, mediated by surgency; situational compliance, on the other hand, was associated with authoritarian parenting and mothers’ use of negative control, which varied by culture. Child opposition was predicted by neither child characteristics nor parenting. These findings provide valuable insights into parenting and children’s compliance in different cultural contexts. The results underscore the importance of looking at human development from a holistic perspective. The active role that children play in shaping their developmental process, their parents’ parenting and the culture they live in should all be taken into account when attempting to understand their development. Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 GMT http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk:80/handle/1810/244266 2013-02-05T00:00:00Z http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk:80/handle/1810/242012 Title: Families created by gamete donation: disclosure and family functioning when children are seven years old Authors: Blake, Lucy Abstract: Recent advances in assisted reproductive technologies have resulted in an increasing number of children born by gamete donation. Children conceived by egg donation lack a genetic link with their mother whereas children conceived by donor insemination lack a genetic link with their father. In families in which parents do not disclose their use of donated gametes, the child is unaware that their mother or their father in not their genetic parent. The aim of this thesis was to assess the impact of non-disclosure, and of the absence of a genetic link between parent and child, on family functioning and child adjustment. Data were obtained from a representative sample of 36 donor insemination, 32 egg donation and 54 natural conception families when the target child was 7 years old. Standardised interview, questionnaire and observational data were obtained from mothers, fathers, children and the child’s teacher. Few differences in family functioning were found between disclosing and non-disclosing gamete donation families. Likewise, few differences emerged between gamete donation families and natural conception families. The families were found to be functioning well irrespective of whether the parents had disclosed and of whether the child lacked a genetic link with a parent. However, comparisons between donor insemination and egg donation families showed that disclosure status and family type interacted in complex ways. Contrary to predictions, disclosure was not always associated with favourable outcomes. Children in disclosing donor insemination families were rated by teachers as having fewer behavioural problems. However, observational ratings showed lower levels of positive mother-child interaction in disclosing egg donation families. The process of disclosure was also explored. In all but one disclosing family, parents had started to talk to their child about their donor conception by age 4, with disclosure typically initiated and maintained by the mother. Despite mothers’ concerns, children did not appear distressed by information about their donor conception. However, interviews with the children themselves suggested that most had little understanding of their donor conception at age 7. Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:00:00 GMT http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk:80/handle/1810/242012 2012-02-07T00:00:00Z http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk:80/handle/1810/241366 Title: Sex differences in general intelligence: a psychometric investigation of group differences in mean and variability as measured by the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices Authors: Savage-McGlynn, Emily Abstract: Researchers and the general public alike continue to debate ‘which is the smarter sex?’ Research to date suggests that males outperform females, females outperform males, while others find no differences in mean or variance. These inconsistent results are thought to occur for two reasons. First, studies rely on opportunity samples rather than samples that represent the general population. Second, researchers have not availed themselves of advances in psychometrics that allow for identification of bias in test items and the reliable evaluation of group differences. This dissertation addresses these two identified needs in the literature. Using a large representative U.K. sample, 926 seven to 18 year olds were assessed with the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices Plus (SPM+), a measure considered to be one of the best measures of general intelligence. In assessing a one-factor model of general intelligence, four research aims were addressed. First, confirmatory factor analyses and assessment of measurement invariance revealed that the SPM+ is not biased to either sex. Second, multiple group confirmatory factor analyses revealed there to be no significant differences between males and females in either mean or variance. Third, analyses revealed no significant sex differences in mean or variability in younger or older participants. Finally, method effects of Gestalt and Visuospatial answering strategies explained some of the residual variance in the model. For the overall sample, males were significantly disadvantaged by the visuospatial element of some of the items. For older participants, the influence of the methods effects was equivalent. It can generally be concluded that there are no significant sex differences in mean or variability on the SPM+ suggesting that there is no sex difference in general intelligence. Future research should employ representative samples and robust statistical methodologies to assess sex differences on the Raven’s from a multiple factor perspective. Description: Approved hardbound copy has subtitle "a psychometric investigation of group differences in mean and variability as measured by the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices Plus" Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:00:00 GMT http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk:80/handle/1810/241366 2011-07-11T23:00:00Z